research-article

Efficient DropBox Deployment toward Improving Post-Disaster Information Exchange in a Smart City

Abstract

In the face of a disaster, the already installed gadgets in a smart city can be leveraged to gather post-disaster situational information. However, owing to the typical disruption of cellular and Internet connectivity during disasters, the possibility of transmitting situational information using conventional communication infrastructure is almost ruled out. The networking research community has strongly proposed the use of delay tolerant networks (DTN) in such challenged network scenario. In this article, we exploit the movement of volunteers carrying smartphones in such a scenario to form a DTN and propose a utility-based DropBox deployment scheme toward improving post-disaster situational information exchange. In this scheme, DropBoxes are deployed across the network at high utility locations. Since the effectiveness of the proposed scheme can be evaluated accurately considering an appropriate post-disaster mobility model suitable for smart cities, we present a human movement model for a post-disaster scenario in a smart city. This movement model is shown to have better performance over other competing movement models in a post-disaster smart city environment. An extensive simulation is performed using ONE simulator to evaluate the comparative performance of the proposed DropBox deployment scheme with some state-of-the-art existing deployment schemes using the presented movement model. Simulation results justify the proposed DropBox deployment scheme improves network performances in terms of delivery ratio, overhead ratio, and average residual energy at the cost of tolerable latency.

References

  1. Yasir Mehmood et al. 2017. Internet-of-things based smart cities: Recent advances and challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 16--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Manage Disaster and Build Resilient Smart Cities. Retreived May 4, 2019 from https://india.smartcitiescouncil.com/article/manage-disaster-and-build-resilient-smart-cities.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. How IoT and FirstNet Can Deliver Emergency Response in Smart Cities. Retrieved May 4, 2019 from https://www.hstoday.us/subject-matter-areas/emergency-preparedness/how-iot-and-firstnet-can-deliver-emergency-response-in-smart-cities/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Three Emerging Technologies to Improve Emergency Management. Retrieved May 4, 2019 from https://datasmart.ash.harvard.edu/news/article/three-emerging-technologies-improve-emergency-management.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Dzung Van DINH et al. 2018. ICT enabling technologies for smart cities. In Proc. ICACT (2018), 606--611.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Smart City Resilience. Retrieved December 10, 2018 from https://www.gsma.com/iot/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/cl_SmartCities_emer_01_131.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Souvik Basu, Siuli Roy, Somprakash Bandyopadhyay, and Sipra Das Bit. 2018. A utility driven post disaster emergency resource allocation system using DTN. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems 99 (2018), 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Suman Bhattacharjee, Siuli Roy, and Sipra DasBit. 2018. DPDRM: A decentralized post-disaster resource management scheme using energy efficient smartphone based DTN. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 111 (2018), 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Abraham Martın-Campillo, Jon Crowcroft, Eiko Yoneki, and Ramon Martı. 2013. Evaluating opportunistic networks in disaster scenarios. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 36 (2013), 870--880.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Apratim Mukherjee, Souvik Basu, Siuli Roy, and Somprakash Bandyopadhyay. 2015. Developing a coherent global view for post disaster situation awareness using opportunistic network. In Proc. COMSNETS (2015).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Souvik Basu, Ayanesh Biswas, Siuli Roy, and Sipra DasBit. 2018. Wise-PRoPHET: A watchdog supervised PRoPHET for reliable dissemination of post disaster situational information over smartphone based DTN. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 109 (2018), 11--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Peng Li, Taiko Kawasaki, Toshiaki Miyazaki, and Song Guo. 2015. Relay placement for latency minimization in delay tolerant networks. In Proc. IEEE ICC Mobile and Wireless Networking Symposium (2015), 3819--3824.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Ying Zhu, Chao Zhang, Xufei Mao, and Yu Wang. 2015. Social based throwbox placement schemes for large-scale mobile social delay tolerant networks. Computer Communications 65, C (2015), 10--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Bo Fan et.al. 2015. Joint optimization of throwbox deployment and storage allocation in mobile social networks. In Proc. IEEE ICC (2015), 1213--1218.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Fan Li et al. 2016. Optimization problems in throwbox-assisted delay tolerant networks: Which throwboxes to activate? How Many Active Ones I Need? IEEE Transactions on Computers 65, 5 (2016), 1663--1670.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Haizhou Bao, Qin Liu, Chuanhe Huang, and Xiaohua Jia. 2017. Minimal road-side unit placement for delay-bounded applications in bus ad-hoc networks. In Proc. IEEE 36th International Performance Computing and Communications Conference (IPCCC) (2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. David B. Johnson and David A. Maltz. 1996. Dynamic source routing in ad hoc wireless networks. Mobile Computing 353 (1996), 153--181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Injong Rhee et al. 2011. On the levy-walk nature of human mobility. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networks 19, 3 (2011), 630--643.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kyunghan Lee et al. 2012. SLAW: Self-Similar least-action human walk. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 20, 2 (2012), 515--529.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Aarti Munjal, Tracy Camp, and William C. Navidi. 2011. SMOOTH: A simple way to model human mobility. In Proc. MSWiM (2011), 351--360.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. M.-D. Yusuf S. Uddin, David M. Nicol, Tarek F. Abdelzaher, and Robin H. Kravets. 2009. A post-disaster mobility model for delay tolerant networking. In Proc. Winter Simulation Conference (2009), 2786--2796.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Linus Bengtsson et al. 2011. Improved response to disasters and outbreaks by tracking population movements with mobile phone network data: A post-earthquake geospatial study in Haiti. PLoS Med. 8, 8 (2011), 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Nabanita Das, Souvik Basu, and Sipra Das Bit. 2018. Hm2Sc: Human movement model for post disaster scenario in smart city. In Proc. Complex Networked Systems for Smart Infrastructure (C-NetSys’18), MobiCom, ACM, New Delhi, India, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Nabanita Das and Sipra DasBit. 2017. ProDiP: PDF based DropBox deployment for improved performance of DTN for emergency situation handling in a smart city. In Proc. ANTS (2017), 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. File:Parisattacks.png. 2019. Wikimedia. Retrieved August 6, 2019 from https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c4/Parisattacks.png.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Nepal earthquake. Retrieved April 9, 2019 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_2015_Nepal_earthquake.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Uttarakhand Floods. Retrieved August 6, 2019 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_North_India_floods.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Suman Bhattacharjee et al. 2017. Implementing multicasting and broadcasting of multimedia data in ONE simulator. In Proc. SIMUTOOLS (2017), 48--56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Anders Lindgren, Avri Doria, and Olov Schelen. 2003. Probabilistic routing in intermittently connected networks. In Proc. SIGMOBILE CCR, 7, 3 (2003), 19--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. John Burgess et al. 2006. MaxProp: Routing for vehicle-based disruption-tolerant networks. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM (2006), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Efficient DropBox Deployment toward Improving Post-Disaster Information Exchange in a Smart City

          Comments