Skip to main content
Log in

Uncertain 4D-transportation problem with maximum profit and minimum carbon emission

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Save article
View saved research
The Journal of Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The impact of transportation on greenhouse gas emissions is significant. Effective transportation planning can help in achieving maximum profit and minimum carbon emission by considering the appropriate route and conveyance. The formulation and resolution of an uncertain multi-objective multi-item 4D-transportation problem with the objectives of maximum profit and minimum carbon emissions is the main focus of this study. Two different models are considered under different conditions, one assuming breakable or damageable items and other assuming non-breakable or non-damageable items. The uniqueness comes in modeling the green 4D-transportation problem with different purchasing price discounts under uncertain environment. Due to insufficient data or due to the complex situation at the time of the transportation activities, several parameters are considered as uncertain variables to attain real-life situations. Here, multi-objective problems are reduced to single-objective problems using uncertain goal programming and uncertain convex combination method. The models are converted into respective crisp equivalents with the help of certain features of uncertainty theory. Some real-life examples are used to demonstrate the models and subsequently to tackle these issues, the Generalized Reduced Gradient method is utilised (using LINGO14.0 solver). By adjusting various confidence levels in the context of chance constraints, different optimal values are achieved. Additionally, compromise solutions for various weights of the two objectives are found using the convex combination approach. A few sensitivity analyses are also offered. The use of this study will assist managers in determining the necessary transported amount, the appropriate supplier with discount offers, the vehicles and routes to be employed in the transportation activity by balancing the economic and environmental hazards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from €37.37 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (India)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Data availability

My manuscript has no associated data.

References

  1. Hitchcock, F.L. 1941. The distribution of a product from several sources to numerous localities. Journal of Mathematical Physic 20: 224–230.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Houthakker, H.S. 1955. On the numerical solution of the transportation problem. J Operations Res Soc Am 3 (2): 210–214.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Schell, E. 1955. Distribution of a product by several properties. Direclorale Manag Analysis, in: Proceed Second Symp linear Program 2: 615–642.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Haley, K. 1962. The solid transportation problem. Oper. Res. 10: 448–463.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zadeh, L. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8: 338–353.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ida, K., M. Gen, and Y. Li. 1996. Neural networks for solving multicriteria solid transportation problem. Comput Industrial Eng 31: 873–877.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Adlakha, V., and K. Kowalski. 1998. A quick sufficient solution to the more-for-less paradox in the transportation problems. Omega 26: 541–547.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, B. 2007. Uncertainty Theory, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, B. 2008. Fuzzy process, hybrid process and uncertain process. J Uncertain Syst 2: 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Weber, G.W., Ö. Uğur, P. Taylan, and A. Tezel. 2009. On optimization, dynamics and uncertainty: A tutorial for gene-environment networks. Discret. Appl. Math. 157 (10): 2494–2513.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, B. 2010. Uncertain risk analysis and uncertain reliability analysis. J Uncertain Syst 4 (3): 163–170.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bektas, T., and G. Laporte. 2011. The pollution-routing problem. Trans Res Part B Method 45 (8): 1232–1250.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tao, Z., and J. Xu. 2012. A class of rough multiple objective programming and its application to solid transportation problem. Inf. Sci. 188: 215–235.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Chakraborty, D., D.K. Jana, and T.K. Roy. 2014. Multi-objective multi-item solid transportation problem with fuzzy inequality constraints. Journal of Inequalities and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2014-338.

  15. Lin, C., K.L. Choy, G.T.S. Ho, and T.W. Ng. 2014. A Genetic Algorithm-based optimization model for supporting green transportation operations. Expert Syst. Appl. 41 (7): 3284–3296.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Guo, H., X. Wang, and S. Zhou. 2015. A transportation Problem with uncertain costs and random supplies. Int J of e-Navigation Maritime Econ 2: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Juman, Z.A.M.S., and M.A. Hoque. 2015. An efficient heuristic to obtain a better initial feasible solution to the transportation problem. Appl. Soft Comput. 34: 813–826.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kundu, P., S. Kar, and M. Maiti. 2015. Multi-item solid transportation problem with type-2 fuzzy parameters. Appl. Soft Comput. 31: 61–80.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gao, Y., L. Yang, and S. Li. 2016. Uncertain models on railway transportation planning problem. Appl. Math. Model. 40 (7–8): 4921–4934.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Kropat, E., A. Özmen, G.W. Weber, S. Meyer-Nieberg, and O. Defterli. 2016. Fuzzy prediction strategies for gene-environment networks - Fuzzy regression analysis for two-modal regulatory systems. RAIRO - Operations Res - Recherche Opérationnelle 50 (2): 413–435.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Fazli-Khalaf, M., A. Mirzazadeh, and M.R. Pishvaee. 2017. A robust fuzzy stochastic programming model for the design of a reliable green closed-loop supply chain network. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 23 (8): 2119–2149.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Javaid, S., S.A. Jalil, and Z. Asim. 2017. A Model for Uncertain Multi-objective Transportation Problem with Fractional Objectives. Inter J Operations Res 14 (1): 11–25.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Kundu, P., M.B. Kar, and S. Kar. 2017. A solid transportation model with product blending and parameters as rough variables. Soft. Comput. 21: 2297–2306.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Roy, S.K., Maity, G., Weber, G.W., Gök, S.Z.A., Conic scalarization approach to solve multi-choice multi-objective transportation problem with interval goal. Annals of Operations Research 253:599-620.

  25. Savku, E., N. Azevedo, and G.W. Weber. 2017. Optimal Control of Stochastic Hybrid Models in the Framework of Regime Switches. In: Pinto, A., Zilberman, D. (eds) Modeling, Dynamics, Optimization and Bioeconomics II. DGS 2014. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 195. Springer, Cham.

  26. Garai, T., D. Chakraborty, and T.K. Roy. 2018. A multi-item multi-objective inventory model in exponential fuzzy environment using chance-operator techniques. J Analys 27: 867–893.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Guo, Z., D. Zhang, H. Liu, Z. He, and L. Shi. 2018. Green transportation scheduling with pickup time and transport mode selections using a novel multi-objective memetic optimization approach. Transp. Res. Part D 60: 137–152.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kar, M.B., P. Kundu, S. Kar, and T. Pal. (2018) A Multi-objective Multi-item Solid Transportation Problem with Vehicle Cost. Volume and Weight Capacity Under Fuzzy Environment 35 (2): 1991 - 1999.

  29. Dalman, H. 2019. Entropy-based multi-item solid transportation problems with uncertain variables. Soft. Comput. 23: 5931–5943.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Khalilpourazari, S., A. Mirzazadeh, G.W. Weber, and S.H.R. Pasandideh. 2019. A robust fuzzy approach for constrained multi-product economic production quantity with imperfect items and rework process. Optimization: J Math Program Operations Res 69 (1): 63–90.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Kundu, P., S. Majumder, and S. Kar. 2019. A method to solve linear programming problem with interval type-2 fuzzy parameters. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Making 18: 103–130.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Majumder, S., P. Kundu, and S. Kar. 2019. Uncertain multi-objective multi-item fixed charge solid transportation problem with budget constraint. Soft. Comput. 23: 3279–3301.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Roy, S.K., S. Midya, and G.W. Weber. 2019. Multi-objective multi-item fixed-charge solid transportation problem under twofold uncertainty. Neural Comp Appl 31: 8593–8613.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Samanta, S., and D.K. Jana. 2019. A multi-item transportation problem with mode of transportation preference by MCDM method in interval type-2 fuzzy environment. Neural Comput. Appl. 31: 605–617.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Aktar, M.S., M. De, S. Samir Maity, S.K. Mazumder, and M. Maiti. 2020. Green 4D transportation problems with breakable incompatible items under type-2 fuzzy-random environment. J. Clean. Prod. 275: 122376.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bera, S., P.K. Giri, D.K. Jana, K. Basu, and M. Maiti. 2020. Fixed charge 4D-TP for a breakable item under hybrid random type-2 uncertain environments. Inf. Sci. 527: 128–158.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Kropat, E., M. Türkay, and G.W. Weber. 2020. Introduction to the Special Issue on Fuzzy Analytics and Stochastic Methods in Neurosciences. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 28 (1): 1-4.

  38. Tirkolaee, E.B., A. Goli, A. Faridnia, M. Soltani, and G.W. Weber. 2020. Multi-objective optimization for the reliable pollution-routing problem with cross-dock selection using Pareto-based algorithms. J. Clean. Prod. 27: 122927.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Samanta, S., D.K. Jana, G. Panigrahi, and M. Maiti. 2020. Novel multi-objective, multi-item and four-dimensional transportation problem with vehicle speed in LR-type intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Neural Comput. Appl. 32: 11937–11955.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Özcan, I., and S.Z.A. Gök. 2021. On the fuzzy interval equal surplus sharing solutions. Kybernetes 51 (9).

  41. Biswas, A., S.K. Roy, and S.P. Mondal. 2022. Evolutionary algorithm based approach for solving transportation problems in normal and pandemic scenario. Appl. Soft Comput. 129: 109576.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Domansky, V., and V. Kreps. 2022. The value function of a transportation problem. Oper. Res. Lett. 50 (2): 107–114.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Ghosh, S., K.H. Kufer, S.K. Roy, and G.W. Weber. 2022. Carbon mechanism on sustainable multi-objective solid transportation problem for waste management in Pythagorean hesitant fuzzy environment. Complex Intel System 8: 4115–4143.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lotfi, R., B. Kargar, and M. Rajabzadeh. 2022. Hybrid Fuzzy and Data-Driven Robust Optimization for Resilience and Sustainable Health Care Supply Chain with Vendor-Managed Inventory Approach. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 24: 1216–1231.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sarkar, B., B. Ganguly, C. Pareek, and L.E. Cárdenas-Barrón. 2022. A three-echelon green supply chain management for biodegradable products with three transportation modes. Comput Industrial Eng 174: 108727.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ding, H., and F. Xie. 2023. A solution technique for capacitated two-level hierarchical time minimization transportation problem. Comput Operations Res 151: 106125.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. Ghosh, S., S.K. Roy, and G.W. Weber. 2023. Interactive strategy of carbon cap-and-trade policy on sustainable multi-objective solid transportation problem with twofold uncertain waste management. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05347-w.

  48. Kenger, O., and E. Özceylan. 2023. Fuzzy min-max neural networks: a bibliometric and social network analysis. Neural Comput. Appl. 35 (7): 5081–5111.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Singh, B., and A. Singh. 2023. Hybrid particle swarm optimization for pure integer linear solid transportation problem. Math. Comput. Simul. 207: 243–266.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dipankar Chakraborty.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest for the publication of this paper.

Ethical approval

We declared that Research work done by self finance. No institutional fund has been provided.

Human and animal reserch

The authors declared that this article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Communicated by S Ponnusamy.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Samanta, S., Chakraborty, D. & Jana, D.K. Uncertain 4D-transportation problem with maximum profit and minimum carbon emission. J Anal 32, 471–508 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41478-023-00654-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41478-023-00654-8

Keywords

Mathematical Subject Classification